Uiser collogue:Mondodi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Frae Wikipedia, the free beuk o knawledge

Walcome![eedit soorce]

Hullo, Mondodi, an walcome til the Wikipedie! Guid tae see ye. Thank ye for yer contribution. Some gibbles ye'll find uissfu:

Bi gaun throu the Commontie Yett ye'll can find aw kynd o wittins adae wi uisin an eikin til the Wikipedie. For tae hae a sey shottie, veesit oor Saundpit.

Dinna haud yer wheesht, haud yer ain! James Hyett (tauk) 21:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

Nomination o George H. W. Bush an broccoli for deletion[eedit soorce]

A discussion is takin place as tae whether the airticle George H. W. Bush an broccoli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipaedia accordin tae Wikipaedia's policies an guidelines or whether it should be deletit.

The airticle will be discussed at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/George H. W. Bush an broccoli till a consensus is reached, an onyane is walcome tae contribute tae the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies an guidelines which are o concern. The discussion focuses on heich-quality evidence an oor policies an guidelines.

Uisers mey edit the airticle durin the discussion, includin tae improve the airticle tae address concerns raised in the discussion. However, dae nae remove the airticle-for-deletion notice frae the tap o the airticle. my_hat_stinks (tauk) 19:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

(en) Slow down please[eedit soorce]

While your contributions are appreciated, it would be more helpful to the project if you stopped creating low-quality stub articles such as George H. W. Bush bowkin incident and First Lady o the Unitit States. Folks here are looking for existing topics that are more of interest to Scots speakers get expanded with more article content in fluent Scots instead.
Cheers, –MJLTauk 23:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

We've got a George H. W. Bush article that's lacking a lot of content if ye must do edits about him. We're trying to push quality over quantity here, and articles such as GHWB's feelings towards broccoli and him throwing up when the GHWB article is lacking tend to veer towards quantity over quality CiphriusKane (tauk) 05:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]
That's fair enough. --Mondodi (tauk) 15:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

Ahdieh[eedit soorce]

I removed the delete tag from Ahdieh when I reverted the Englification of the article. If ye still believe the article should be deleted, it should go through a VfD at this point CiphriusKane (tauk) 05:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

I don't really have feelings one way or another on the article. I just find it odd that they have an article here but not on enwiki, and because the article was pretty much in English when I saw it I just assumed the article was created on the wrong wiki or something (I didn't know about the Anglicization of the article). In addition, the tone seems very promotional and there are no references whatsoever. --Mondodi (tauk) 15:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]
Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ahdieh feel free to add yer comments here, cause they're perfectly valid concerns CiphriusKane (tauk) 11:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]
Thanks! Copied my above comment at the VfD. --Mondodi (tauk) 12:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

Scots ability[eedit soorce]

It's clear that you're very enthusiastic and you've been very prolific over the past few days which is commendable in its own right, but with all respect your ability in Scots leaves a lot to be desired. You're mostly writing in English with some superficial Scottish spellings and the occasional Scots expression, and you're using a lot of those incorrectly. You’re even using Middle Scots in some places, and I shouldn’t need to tell you why that isn’t really appropriate. These sorts of word-for-word "translations" with lacking vocabulary and no regard for Scots idiom or grammar are what caused all the difficulty with Scots Wikipedia in the first place. I’d like to ask as politely as I can that you refrain from creating any more articles or making any substantial edits until you have a better grasp of the language. There are plenty of resources out there that could help you out. You seem to have a particular interest in Northern Ireland so on that score I'd recommend Ian James Parsley's Ulster Scots: A Short Reference Grammar and James Fenton's The Hamely Tongue. More generally speaking I'd also recommend getting yourself William Lorimer's translation of the New Testament, as well as David Purves' A Scots Grammar and a copy of the Concise Scots Dictionary.

You can absolutely still contribute in other ways. There's a lot else that needs fixing up apart from the language. The formatting and citations in your articles are by far the best I’ve seen here. As you've probably seen yourself the Wiki is a bit lacking in that regard, so if you could help out in those areas I'm sure it would be very much appreciated by everyone, and there'd be nothing stopping you from getting back to creating articles once your Scots improves. Ultaigh (tauk) 03:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

Thank you very much for the resource suggestions, and so sorry if I've caused any more trouble here. Thanks for being so patient and polite with me as well, I do appreciate it.
I'll refrain from making any more articles; if anyone needs any help with citations then they're free to comment here. --Mondodi (tauk) 03:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

Collogue:Norn iron[eedit soorce]

Hey, Collogue:Norn iron is ineligible for speedy deletion as it's currently being VfD'd as part of a batch nomination here CiphriusKane (tauk) 11:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

Ah thanks! Apologies, I just stumbled across the page for it. --Mondodi (tauk) 14:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]
Given that I was planning on running the query again before deleting the talk pages, you might've accidentally postponed this page's demise in the short term haha. –MJLTauk 06:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]

Nomination o Ephebophilia for deletion[eedit soorce]

A discussion is takin place as tae whether the airticle Ephebophilia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipaedia accordin tae Wikipaedia's policies an guidelines or whether it should be deletit.

The airticle will be discussed at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ephebophilia till a consensus is reached, an onyane is walcome tae contribute tae the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies an guidelines which are o concern. The discussion focuses on heich-quality evidence an oor policies an guidelines.

Uisers mey edit the airticle durin the discussion, includin tae improve the airticle tae address concerns raised in the discussion. However, dae nae remove the airticle-for-deletion notice frae the tap o the airticle. –MJLTauk 17:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[Replie]