Uiser collogue:RedhotRod4

⚠️ WARNING! I don’t stand for trolling or vandalism. RedhotRod4 (tauk) 11:37, 16 Januar 2021 (UTC)

Januar 2021

Your source has been identified as a hoax that you created. Please stop with the false claims and falsifying evidence or you will be blocked CiphriusKane (tauk) 19:55, 16 Januar 2021 (UTC)

I was not creating a hoax. Thank you. Even if the source was a hoax, I respect you and your opinion but Eddie Van Halen is alive. That’s my opinion and it always will be. Thank you. RedhotRod4 (tauk) 23:39, 16 Januar 2021 (UTC)

Eddie Van Halen

Please stop yer disruptive editin. Yer edits hae been revertit or removed. Gin yer haein ae edit dispute wi anither editor, tak the maitter tae their collogue page or the airticle's collogue page. Gin it is anither form o dispute, gang tae the Administrator's Noticebuird. Dinna keep makkin edits that appear disruptive till the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuin tae edit disruptively micht end up wi yer accoont bein blockit fae editin. soothrhins (tauk) 10:07, 17 Januar 2021 (UTC)

I wasn’t trying to make my edit appear disruptive. I only added a citation. RedhotRod4 (tauk) 13:12, 17 Januar 2021 (UTC)

Block

Ye hae been blockit frae eeditin for a period o indefinite for disruptive editin. Ance the block haes expired, ye are walcome tae make uisefu contreibutions. Gin ye think there are guid reasons whit wye ye shoud be unblockit, ye mey appeal this block bi first readin the guide tae appealin blocks, then addin the follaein text ablo this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

CiphriusKane (tauk) 13:23, 17 Januar 2021 (UTC)

This blocked uiser's unblock request haes been reviewed bi an administrator, that declined the request. Ither administrators mey review this block as weel, but sudnae owerride the deceision athoot guid raison (see the blockin policy). Dinnae remuive this unblock review whiles ye are blocked.

RedhotRod4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deletit contribs • creaution log • change block settins • unblock • filter log)

---

Request raison:

I promise to refrain from editin disruptively and make useful contreibutions in future. RedhotRod4 (tauk) 13:26, 17 Januar 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

(in Inglis)I see no reason to unblock. You have removed sourced information from pages claiming it couldn't be verified. You have engaged in edit wars with other users. You have accused an administrator of vandalism when they protected a page against you. You have added completely unverified information, including multiple stubs with no sources. You appear to have a limited understanding of Scots and are not keeping your edits within your capabilites. You have made an unfoudned VfD simply because a page you were edit warring on was protected. And perhaps worst of all, you have perpetuated hoaxes on this wiki.

You have not addressed these points in your unblock request and you have yet to show any evidence you will improve in future. my_hat_stinks (tauk) 13:50, 17 Januar 2021 (UTC)

• Correction: I've been informed that the VfD was attempted before the page was protected. However, the point does still stand; you tried to get a page deleted because an edit war you started wasn't going your way. my_hat_stinks (tauk) 14:12, 17 Januar 2021 (UTC)

---

If ye want tae mak ony forder unblock requests, please read the guide tae appealin blocks first, then uise the {{unblock}} template again. If ye mak ower mony unconvincin or disruptive unblock requests, ye micht be preventit frae eeditin this page until yer block haes deet.

(en) As your reaction to MHS's review was to attack him, including making homophobic remarks, I've revoked your talk page access CiphriusKane (tauk) 14:06, 17 Januar 2021 (UTC)

I endorse this course of action. –MJL ‐Tauk‐^☖ 16:41, 17 Januar 2021 (UTC)