Wikipedia:Votes for deletion

Frae Wikipedia, the free beuk o knawledge
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page haes an archive here. Ye can tag for speedy deletion a page by adding {{delete}} tae the tap. Tae add a page here, tag it wi {{subst:Airticle for deletion}}, then create Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/AIRTICLE TITLE wi {{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=U|text=Reason}} ~~~~, finally add {{Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/AIRTICLE TITLE}} unner the "Leetins" section o this page.

Archives[eedit soorce]

Leetins[eedit soorce]

Define:Ee dialect[eedit soorce]

Define:ee dialect (edit|tauk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find soorces: "Define:Ee dialect" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

As per wiki policy, "Unsoorced material mey be challenged an remuived." The material in question in this case is the definition, and given that it's the entire point of the page removing the unsourced material would immediately make it eligible for speedy deletion under "Nae content". The author was notified 48 hours ago of the issues on the page and rather than make an attempt to fix the issues claimed they didn't understand English, which is easily refuted by their edit history. If somebody fixes the page I'll withdraw this, but if nobody's willing or able to do so then that in itself stands in support of this nomination. my_hat_stinks (tauk) 21:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Support if no impruived. Its present plyte disnae expone whit (in Inglis) "Eye dialect" is. soothrhins (tauk) 23:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Support Onless rewrate, the soorces contradict the text. Spellins in DSL/SND are no relatit tae pronoonciation, thay dae that bi usin the IPA. Monospaced (tauk) 01:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

query-48929[eedit soorce]

Wikipedia:Kirkyaird/query-48929 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)

These are essentially Proposal 2 articles which were edited by a bot. There are only a total of 2 edits, but I will probably expand the criteria to 3 or more depending if there is consensus to delete this list first. –MJLTauk 18:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:Asbox/Yoch[eedit soorce]

AfDs for this airticle:
    Template:Asbox/Yoch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find soorces: "Template:Asbox/Yoch" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

    (in Inglis) This template was only being used for Template:Stub/Leid, having been created by Uiser:Varlaam for what was remarked upon in the recent yoch RfC as being the "weird" factor. I have changed {{Stub/Leid}} to be in line with other Stub sub-templates, using the generic {{Asbox}}, so this sub-template is no longer needed. James Hyett (tauk) 21:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

    Ephebophilia[eedit soorce]

    Ephebophilia (edit | talk | history | protect | links | watch | logs | Delete | page views (90d)) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find soorces: "Ephebophilia" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

    Rebuilding an encyclopedia is hard work. I really hope we don't build it on a foundation of articles like these ones which aren't particularly notable to Scots Speakers. –MJLTauk 17:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

    • Support of course James Hyett (tauk) 18:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Support as the article isn't useful as it stands. I'm curious as to what notability to Scots speakers actually entails though; would that mean an article on this subject, written in guid Scots, would also be deleted? --Mondodi (tauk) 21:23, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Support. Fur bein ainly twa sentences wi nae soorces, if wir Wikipedia:Notability policy wis in place it widnae pass it. Deletin pages jist cause ye think maist Scots speakers willnae need it micht no be the best precedent tae set, if the issues git sortit the page shuidnae be deletit. my_hat_stinks (tauk) 23:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Support per MHS CiphriusKane (tauk) 02:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

    Special:UnusedFiles[eedit soorce]

    The follaein discussion is an airchived debate o the proponed deletion o the airticle ablo. Please dinna modifee it. Subsequent comments shoud be makit on the appropriate discussion page (sic as the airticle's talk page or in a deletion review). No forder eedits shoud be makit tae this page.

    The result wis Soft-delete. Unused non-free files should be deleted as needed. –MJLTauk 15:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

    AfDs for this airticle:
      Special:UnusedFiles (edit | [[Talk:Special:UnusedFiles|talk]] | history | protect | links | watch | logs | Delete | page views (90d)) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find soorces: "Special:UnusedFiles" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

      (in Inglis) Nominating the currently 673 unused non-free files listed on Special:UnusedFiles for deletion. Fair use policy (if any) is no longer applicable to these files as they are not used in any justifiable context. --Andreas (tauk) 17:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

      The abuin discussion is preserved as an airchive o the debate. Please dinnae modifee it. Subsequent comments shoud be makit on the appropriate discussion page (sic as the airticle's talk page or in a deletion review). Na forder eedits shoud be made tae this page.

      Wikipedia:Kirkyaird/massive[eedit soorce]

      Wikipedia:Kirkyaird/massive (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD · Stats)
      Wikipedia:Kirkyaird/Close to Proposal 2 § Massive

      This is nomination of every article (A) created without edit since or (B) created with at least 2 edits since by a list of null users (high profile users who do not speak sufficient Scots - like myself). This will not include exempt airticles. In total, I have counted 4742 which qualify for this category, but this number is subject to change as articles continue to be edited and exempt airticles are both added or removed. –MJLTauk 21:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

      Comment. For clarity, can we have a list of the users involved here? Also, again for clarity, do the articles on this list only have edits from bots and the involved non-Scots speakers? my_hat_stinks (tauk) 21:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
      @My hat stinks: I was still working on the nomination reason when you commented.
      However, to answer your questions, a list of users and bots can be found at quarry:query/49315. These articles only have edits from said accounts. –MJLTauk 21:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

      Mazda RX-4[eedit soorce]

      Mazda RX-4 (edit | talk | history | protect | links | watch | logs | Delete | page views (90d)) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find soorces: "Mazda RX-4" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

      Iss airticle haes been Inglified tae mony times tae the pynt aat a cannae see a guid version aat isnae Ingels or Scotched. It's aasla got tonal issues an we're best stairtin fresh wi iss airticle mehinks CiphriusKane (tauk) 11:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)