Collogue:Calgacus

This is the collogue page for discussin impruivements tae the Calgacus article.
This isna a forum for general discussion o the airticle's subject.

Pit new text unner auld text. Click here tae stairt a new topic.
Please sign an date yer posts bi teepin fower tildes ( ~~~~ ).
New tae Wikipaedia? Walcome! Ask quaistens, get answers.

Be polite, an walcomin tae new uisers
Assume guid faith
Avoid personal attacks

Airticle policies

Guid airticle, bit ye shuid puit mair links in, wi twa square brackets:

[[Onyhin]]

Dae that roon onyhin ye hink cuid or shuid hae an airticle o its ain.

Bazza 13:54, 3 Julie 2007 (UTC)[Replie]

At mair like it?

Aye :-) Ye can sign yer name on these pages bi writin ~~~~ at the end, by the wey. Bazza 09:36, 4 Julie 2007 (UTC)[Replie]

Mebbes the qoutes fae beuks shoud be in the oreeginal English an no wir ain translation. Pitten in italics. 84.135.211.11 13:33, 4 Julie 2007 (UTC)[Replie]

Aye, Ah gree. Ah hink it's OK tae translate it, bit then we shuidnae say it's a quote. Bazza 14:15, 4 Julie 2007 (UTC)[Replie]

Bot it is a quote, I wad jalouse. Efter aw, the muckle quote frae Tacitus isnae in the Latin! Duncan Sneddon

Hmmm, mibbes. Bit ye're also quoting frae a beuk (the Prebble quote) as if it's a direc quotation, bit it's no. Ye've oweset it yersel intae Scots, an so it's nae langer a direct quote - ye cuid hae puit yer ain spin on it, likes. Bazza 08:49, 5 Julie 2007 (UTC)[Replie]