Collogue:Atheism

This is the collogue page for discussin impruivements tae the Atheism article.
This isna a forum for general discussion o the airticle's subject.

Pit new text unner auld text. Click here tae stairt a new topic.
Please sign an date yer posts bi teepin fower tildes ( ~~~~ ).
New tae Wikipaedia? Walcome! Ask quaistens, get answers.

Be polite, an walcomin tae new uisers
Assume guid faith
Avoid personal attacks

Airticle policies

Please mention the non-personhood-biased nature of the first cause of the cosmos as deemed by atheists

Usually atheists deem the first cause of the cosmos mathematically accessible, and non-personhood-biased / non-personocratic.

Of course atheists have many sub-dogmas on the specifics.

The terms antitranscendentalist and antisupernaturalist are stricter and more specific than atheism, in which not only the notion god is deemed impossible, but any non-logical process.

Common atheists might either be antitranscendentalist, or godless transcendentalists (few believe in non-mathematically approachable phenomena).

We should create the page antitranscendentalism, because some strict atheists don't feel weel represented within a labeled cohort which sometimes is open to transcendentalism.