Wikipedia:Requests for adminship

Frae Wikipedia
Lowp tae: navigation, rake


Tuim the cache for tae renew this page

Shortcut:

Requests for adminship (nae ti be confounded wi requests for arbitration at WP:RFAr) is a page ti nominate yersel or ithers for ti become a Wikipedia administrator. Admins hae access til a puckle technical featurs that help wi Wikipedia maintenance. Please see the readin list an wey-to guide afore appleein here.

Administrators the nou | Neow admins | Unsuccessful candidacies (since September 2005)


Aboot RfA[eedit | eedit soorce]

Administrator status is grantit ti trustie members o the commonty that's fameiliar wi Wikipedia policies. Admins dinna hae ony byordinar authority on Wikipedia, but is hauden ti heich standards, sin they are seen bi some uisers as the "offeicial face" o Wikipedia. Admins shuid be mainerlie, an shuid shaw guid juidgment an patience in dealin wi ithers. Nominees shuid hae been on Wikipedia lang eneuch for fowk ti see gif they hae thir qualities or no. Houaniver, adminship shuidna be a muckle thing. Admin actions is reversible; bein an admin is maistlins an extra responsibeility, sin there are rules an policies that juist applees til admins.

Nomination staundarts
Maist neow admins haes mair nor three month o parteecipation an mair nor 1000 edits. See the standards for adminship expectit bi some raigulars on this page. Ye can uise kate's tool ti coont a nominee's edits; mind that # of edits micht be inflated bi frequent smaa edits.

Ye dow nominate yersel.

Anonymous users canna be nominated, nor nominate ithers, nor vote. They are alloued ti comment tho.

Nomination process
Nominations stay for seiven days, for votes an comments. Bureaucrats dow at their discretion extend this whan consensus isna clair; the threshold for consensus on this page is rochlie 75-80 percent support. In extraordinar circumstances, bureaucrats micht chuise forbye ti void the walins cast an require a rewale. Thae nominations that will clairly fail micht be taen awa aerlier for ti stop collogues that causes ill will; houaniver, sin maist editors disna veisit Wikipedia ilka day, a raisonable time shuid be gien. Some uisers opposes aerlie removal under onie circumstances. Gin yer nomination is rejectit, please wait a raisonable time afore appleein ance mair (say, a month).


Sel-nominations Please review the qualifications abuin. Some editors feels that sel-nominees shoud "exceed the ordinar guidelines by guid meisur", hae an accoont name that is mony months auld an hae mnny hunders o edits (in practice onybody wi less nor 1000 edits haesna a real chance o passin). This is no tae say that sel-nominators is necessar ony less qualifee'd nor "sponsored" nominations. Maist voters can be presumed tae conseeder aw nominees on their ain merits, an there's e'en a few that leuks wi speicial favour on sel-nominations as expressin a suitable independence. A guid solit backgrund is equally important for baith kynd o nomination. Obviously unqualifee'd nominations o aither kynd micht coud be removed athoot discussion.


Votin
For tae eik your vote, edit the section for that candidate. Aw Wikipaedians wi an accoont is walcome tae vote. Lang discussions shoud be hauden in the Comments section.

Please shaw whither ye uphaud or oppose the candidate. Ye can cast a neutral vote that winna be tabulated in the final calculations an aw. Whan ye cast yer vote, please conseeder providin an expoondin, specially on oppose an neutral votes, sae the candidate or ither voters can unnerstaund an address it. In a close nomination, aw explanations an comments will be conseedered, includin thaim that's in neutral votes. Ye shoud can update the vote tot whan votin an aw.

In yer comments an responses, please be respectfu o ithers. Some dialogs micht become contentious an emotional. Mynd that we are aw fowk wi feeling, emotions an pride.

For tae nominate somebody (includin yersel)

  1. Edit this page an eik the follaein text abuin the maist recent nomination:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/UserName}}
    ----
  2. Follae the reid airtin tae Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/UserName an eik the follaein:
    ===[[User:UserName|]]===
    '''[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/UserName|action=edit}} Vote here] (0/0/0) ending {{subst:CURRENTTIME}} [[00 Month]] [[2005]] (UTC)'''
    {{User|USERNAME}} - Yer nomination/descreeption o the uiser --~~~~
    {{subst:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Candidate quaistens}}
  3. Preview yer nomination for tae check it; replace [[00 Month]] wi the date fae yer seegnatur but mak the date sieven days efter.
  4. Gin the nominatit uiser is on the List o non-admins wi a heich edit coont, please update their status for tae reflect the new nomination, wi an airtin tae the nomination page.

Current nominations[eedit | eedit soorce]

AmaryllisGardener[eedit | eedit soorce]

Vote here (0/0/0) ending 16:18 5 Februar 2014 (UTC) AmaryllisGardener (talk · contribs) - Syne thare are no active admins here ither nor masel, I would lik tae extend ma adminship so I could perform admin tasks lik deletions an editin pertectit pages an templates. I wis grantit adminship for three months bi a steward in November efter ma previous RFA, so I could fix pertectit templates. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 16:18, 29 Januar 2014 (UTC)

Candidate, please shaw gin ye accept the nomination here: Aye.

Support

Oppone

Neutral

Comments

Quaistens for the candidate
A feow generic quaistens tae gie guidance tae the voters:

1. Whit sysop chores, if ony, wad ye foresee yersel holpin wi? (Please read the page aboot administrators an the administrators' readin leet.)
Deletions an really ony admin tasks.
2. Amang yer ain airticles or contreibutions tae Wikipaedia, are there ony that ye'r rael prood o, an whit wey?
Nae really.
3. Haev ye bin in ony fechts ower editin in the past or div ye feel that ither uisers hae caused ye pain? Whit haev ye duin aboot it and whit will ye dae aboot it in the future?
Nae fichts.

AmaryllisGardener 3[eedit | eedit soorce]

Vote here (0/0/0) ending 21:18 10 August 2014 (UTC) AmaryllisGardener (talk · contribs) - I would lik tae extend ma temporary adminship. --AmaryllisGardener talk 21:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Candidate, please shaw gin ye accept the nomination here: Aye.

Support

Oppone

Neutral

Comments

Quaistens for the candidate
A feow generic quaistens tae gie guidance tae the voters:

1. Whit sysop chores, if ony, wad ye foresee yersel holpin wi? (Please read the page aboot administrators an the administrators' readin leet.)
Whit I hae been doin. Deletin, revertin vandalism, an editin pertected pages when needit.
2. Amang yer ain airticles or contreibutions tae Wikipaedia, are there ony that ye'r rael prood o, an whit wey?
Nae really.
3. Haev ye bin in ony fechts ower editin in the past or div ye feel that ither uisers hae caused ye pain? Whit haev ye duin aboot it and whit will ye dae aboot it in the future?
No.

Varlaam[eedit | eedit soorce]

Vote here (0/0/0) endin 19:20 21 Januar 2013 (UTC) Varlaam (talk · contribs) - Yer nomination/descreeption o the uiser --
Fae Wikipedia:Administrators:
The Scots Wikipedia policy jist nou is tae grant this access liberally tae onybody that haes bin an active Wikipedia contributor fur a while an is generally a weel kent an trustie member o the community.

A'm appleein tae be a administrator o oor Scots Wikipedie. A hae leart tae scrieve in Scots syne the simmer time, maistly bi fou an carefu readin o mony o wir airticles here.
A hae bocht the anerlie prentit Scots dictionar whilk A hae can find here in the ceity o Toronto.
A'm a ingineer wi a backgrund in saftware an guideship, an a lang-time interest in leids forby.
A'v been this project's Walcomin Comatee for several month the nou.
Thare are gey monie seestems tribbles here that need tae be leuked ower.
Varlaam (talk) 19:20, 14 Januar 2013 (UTC)

Candidate, please shaw gin ye accept the nomination here: Ay.

Support

  1. Maist active editor. Bzweebl (talk) 00:53, 17 Januar 2013 (UTC)
Comment. (Inglis) That is an understandable, but incorrect, impression. In fact, our most productive editor is Fixer88.
Varlaam (talk) 08:21, 21 Januar 2013 (UTC)

Oppone

  1. Oppose (or Oppone) due to concerns below. I might change if you respond to the questions well. PiRSquared17 (talk) 15:16, 21 Januar 2013 (UTC)
    I will reconsider my position on this request should you provide answers to the aforementioned subsequent inquiries. PiRSquared17 (talk) 03:14, 1 Februar 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

Quaistens for the candidate
A feow generic quaistens tae gie guidance tae the voters:

1. Whit sysop chores, if ony, wad ye foresee yersel holpin wi? (Please read the page aboot administrators an the administrators' readin leet.)
Aw.
2. Amang yer ain airticles or contreibutions tae Wikipaedia, are there ony that ye'r rael prood o, an whit wey?
A wrate ane o the muckle maist airticles in Inglis Wikipedie. It is nou in nine or ten smawer pairts.
A wared three month o 2012 ilka day reddin up the Inglis leet o films o the Seicont Warld War; it is nou in sax or seiven pairts.
3. Haev ye bin in ony fechts ower editin in the past or div ye feel that ither uisers hae caused ye pain? Whit haev ye duin aboot it and whit will ye dae aboot it in the future?
Nae fechts in Scots. In Inglis, senior editors hae nae pouers tae stop tribblemakkers wha dinna wish tae be helpfu collaborators athin a team o editors. Nae fechts in French, Spainyie, German, Roushie, Italian.
4 Can you explain (in English please, Scots is a bit difficult for me to read) m:User talk:Spacebirdy/Archiv2011#That_is_the_policy_of_our_Wikipedia? Why were you adding this user's nationality (which might have been wrong)? There can't be a policy about this because it is against WMF's rules (i.e., privacy policy). PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:50, 21 Januar 2013 (UTC)
4b' (follow up question) Why don't you like it when users add language/babel information (relevant information), but you like adding their nationality, which is irrelevant? (without confirming it... not all German speakers come from Germany) PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:58, 21 Januar 2013 (UTC)
5 Can you explain (again, in English if possible) this message and your block? It's nothing against you, but I'd like to understand why you were blocked. Actually, you don't need to create babel templates. It's not that important. These users just want to show what languages they know because it is helpful when translating or showing that you don't speak a project's language. PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:50, 21 Januar 2013 (UTC)
6 When would you block users? For example, would you block User talk:Chauahuasachca? PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:50, 21 Januar 2013 (UTC)



Requests for bureaucratship[eedit | eedit soorce]

Bureaucrats are admeinistrators wi the extra pouer ti mak ither fowk admins or bureaucrats, based on community deceisions raxed here. They can change the uiser name o onie ither uiser an aa. The process for bureaucrats is seimlar ti that for adminship abuin, but is maistlins jist bi request. The expectation for bureaucratship is heicher nor for adminship, in terms o nummers o votes, abeility til engage voters an candidates, an signeificant disqualifications.

Bureaucrats are expected tae determine consensus in sweir cases an ti be ready to justifee their decisions. Walin sections an bylerplate quaistens for candidates can be insertit uisin {{subst:Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Candidate quaistens}}.

Please eik neow requests at the tap o this section juist ablo (an please update the headers whan walin)


Avicennasis[eedit | eedit soorce]

Vote here (0/0/0) endin 01:17 20 September 2013 (UTC) Avicennasis (talk · contribs) - Syne Mendor is na langer a bureaucrat acause o bein inactive, the Scots Wikipedie is in need o a bureaucrat again. Avicennasis is would mak a guid bureaucrat. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 01:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 01:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Oppone

Neutral

Comments



Gin this page disna update richt, either clear yer cache or click here ti purge the server's cache.