Wikipedia collogue:Notability

Frae Wikipedia, the free beuk o knawledge
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Votes for namin 'notability' policy[eedit soorce]

NO ACTION

Nae consensus, nae action. No monie votes an they didnae agree.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Acause thare is no Scots wird wi sib meanin ti "notable" or "notability" in Inglis, we need a consensus on whit ti caw "notability" on Scots Wikipedia. Vote ablo. Ye can vote for mair than yin (sae e.g. vote for twa but no yin ye really dinnae want). soothrhins (tauk) 09:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]

Ti vote, pit yer name unner yer preferrd wirdin wi this code: # ~~~~
1: Wirdy o tent

Worthy of notice (in Inglis).

2: Remarkablenesse

Frae Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue

3: Uncos

"Uncos (pl. n) are notable or special items."

Votes for Wirdy o tent
  1. Entohist (tauk) 12:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]
  2. soothrhins (tauk) 23:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]
Votes for Remarkablenesse
  1. Example first vote
Votes for Uncos
  1. Example first vote

Surely the Scots word for indicating the notability of somebody or something kenspeckle would be derived from notable? Nogger (tauk) 20:52, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


RfC on 'notability' policy[eedit soorce]

RESOLVED

New policy establisht

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Thar is nae 'Notabliity' (in Inglis) policy on Scots Wikipedia, but this is sumhin we sud hae. As an airt for editors on the teep an quality o airticles expectit, an likeweys for admins tae uise in makin decrees on jubish content.

The proponed policy is sib ti whit Inglis Wikipedia haes. A ettled ti scroll in an appen wey so it shuid no haud us back in futur. Main difference frae Inglis Wikipedia ar:

  • scryin at airticles shuid be scrieved in braid Scots
  • bein clear aboot needin at least two references fae sindry soorces
  • seekin langer airticles (conter ti stubs) wi:
  • "If ye can anely scroll twa-three sentences anent a topic, it isnae 'notable' eneuch for its ane airticle."

Shuid the proponed 'Notability' policy be established? soothrhins (tauk) 09:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]

  • Aye soothrhins (tauk) 23:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]
  • Aye. Since it seems like the Define namespace is here to stay though, the second point ("no aboot descrivin meanins o wirds") should be updated to reflect that. It should still apply to non-Define pages. my_hat_stinks (tauk) 11:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]
@My hat stinks:, updatit ti include Define namespace. soothrhins (tauk) 12:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]
@My hat stinks: new line eikit ti policy ye hae umwhile greed ti. soothrhins (tauk) 00:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]
I agree with the updates so far, my vote is still the same. my_hat_stinks (tauk) 11:34, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]
  • Aye Assumin this is the intent, dis it need to be spelt oot unner 'Capable o bein substantious' that notability on ither projects haes nae berin on this ane? Takin the Capaldi exmaple, ye still should need tae shaw ye can support an airticle for the airtist in the Scots leid afore stairin ane for an album. We hae hale categories o ane line airticles pit ower from ither projects wi nae content. Monospaced (tauk) 23:59, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]
@Monospaced: guid pynt, hae eikit a line (sib ti note at heid o the policy. soothrhins (tauk) 00:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]
@My hat stinks: & @Monospaced: A hae eikit mair steps ti tak if speirin 'notability'. See difference here: [1] soothrhins (tauk) 13:13, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[Replie]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.