Thomas Kuhn

Thomas Kuhn
Thomas Kuhn
Born	Thomas Samuel Kuhn; 18 Julie 1922; Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.
Dee'd	17 Juin 1996 (aged 73); Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.
Alma mater	Harvard University
Era	20t-century filosofie
Region	Wastren Filosofie
Schuil	Analytic
Main interests	Filosofie o science
Notable ideas	Paradigm shift; Incommensurability; Normal science; Kuhn loss;
	Influences Kant; Koyré; Polanyi; Van Vleck; Fleck; Wittgenstein; A. Maier; Metzger; Meyerson; Piaget; Popper; Hanson; ;
	Influenced Feyerabend; Lakatos; Kitcher; ;

Thomas Samuel Kuhn (/ˈkuːn/; Julie 18, 1922 – Juin 17, 1996) wis an American pheesicist, historian an filosofer o science whase controversial 1962 beuk The Structure of Scientific Revolutions wis influential in baith academic an popular circles, introducin the term paradigm shift, which haes syne acome an idiom.

References[eedit | eedit soorce]

↑ Thomas Kuhn (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): "Not all the achievements of the preceding period of normal science are preserved in a revolution, and indeed a later period of science may find itself without an explanation for a phenomenon that in an earlier period was held to be successfully explained. This feature of scientific revolutions has become known as 'Kuhn-loss'".
↑ Aviezer Tucker (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography, Blackwell Publishing, 2011 : "Analytic Realism".
↑ Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 48.
↑ ^a ^b Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 44.
↑ Robert J. Richards, Lorraine Daston (eds.), Kuhn's 'Structure of Scientific Revolutions' at Fifty: Reflections on a Science Classic, University of Chicago Press, 2016, p. 47.
↑ ^a ^b ^c ^d Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. vi.
↑ Burman, J. T. (2007). "Piaget No 'Remedy' for Kuhn, But the Two Should be Read Together: Comment on Tsou's 'Piaget vs. Kuhn on Scientific Progress'". Theory & Psychology. 17 (5): 721–732. doi:10.1177/0959354307079306.
↑ Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 146.
↑ Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 27.

[1] Thomas Kuhn (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): "Not all the achievements of the preceding period of normal science are preserved in a revolution, and indeed a later period of science may find itself without an explanation for a phenomenon that in an earlier period was held to be successfully explained. This feature of scientific revolutions has become known as 'Kuhn-loss'".

[2] Aviezer Tucker (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography, Blackwell Publishing, 2011 : "Analytic Realism".

[3] Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 48.

[Kuhn44-4] Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 44.

[5] Robert J. Richards, Lorraine Daston (eds.), Kuhn's 'Structure of Scientific Revolutions' at Fifty: Reflections on a Science Classic, University of Chicago Press, 2016, p. 47.

[Kuhnvi-6] Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. vi.

[Burman,_J._T._2007-7] Burman, J. T. (2007). "Piaget No 'Remedy' for Kuhn, But the Two Should be Read Together: Comment on Tsou's 'Piaget vs. Kuhn on Scientific Progress'". Theory & Psychology. 17 (5): 721–732. doi:10.1177/0959354307079306.

[8] Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 146.

[9] Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1970 (2nd ed.), p. 27.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]